- Program like jdiskreport that does not need java mac os#
- Program like jdiskreport that does not need java code#
- Program like jdiskreport that does not need java free#
QT runs on Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, and various Unix flavors. QT is the basis of KDE, but it is also used for the user interface, db access, sockets, and threading in large commercial softare products such as Adobe, JDEdwards (not PeopleSoft EnterpriseOne), and Opera (just to name three of many). I think Javas biggest trouble from a user standpoint is waiting 5-30 seconds extra for the VM to load.įor cross platform API/GUI toolkits, take a look at QT. The language doesn’t make the program, the programmer does. Sit a good programmer in front of Java and watch him develop something quick and useful.
Program like jdiskreport that does not need java code#
Sit a rotten program with no concern for speed in front of a c++ compiler and watch him write the slowest code you’ve ever seen. It’s about doing things properly as much as using the quickest code. I’ve heard people complain about Limewires speed, but if asked about Kazaa they’ll admit it works better (probably because it lacks the rediculous interface and over abundance of spyware and ads). And I think there are numerous examples of Java apps that just work. User’s don’t care what you write it in, they just want it to work. If that’s done at the cost of speed most argue “faster hardware will fix it.” I disagree with wasting clock cycles, but some applications seem to work fine, if done right, in Java/python/perl or any other runtime/VM language. Making development more productive means more features and better interfaces for the user. To an extent you’re right, and to another more important extent you’re wrong. Sorry, your article is little more than your opinion, which seems rather poorly thought out to me. Avoiding the pitfalls of continuous porting is good business sense for any company. NET 1.1 aren’t fully compatible, but you can still run 8 year old Java 1.0 apps on any later Java Virtual Machine. In the real, real world most companies don’t want to spend all their money porting apps every three years just cause some vendor has made their O/S backwards-compatible but in a painful way. And developers are sick and tired of using a new API for each platform (I know I am). Plenty of users need apps that work on whatever desktop they are using (the future is becoming more heterogenous not less in the O/S space). Just wait until Mono starts eating into the Visual Studio.NET space and see the lawsuits come out. You can say thay about C# for either Mono or DotGNU can you.
Program like jdiskreport that does not need java free#
And at least Sun has granted everyone free use of their patent to do their own Java implementations if they like. You might try and do a little research before you spout on how good C# is. Java ain’t perfect, but C# isn’t either, not by a long way. I been using C++ for 13 years, Java for 7, and C# for 1 in my day job and I still prefer Java – it is merely a matter of taste (and it is easier to lead a team with Java since even programmers who lack enterprise-level architectural skills can’t do too much bad stuff with it, unlike the C++ pointer-wannabe C#). Since I program scientific frame grabbers for a living all the camera and grabber vendors who provide a Java interface (Basler, Epix) do a much better job of getting things to work than their MFC equivalents. (and SWING is now OpenGL accelerated in v1.5.0 beta2). Mostly Java suffered because it the GUI was unusably slow until v1.4.2 Ok, sure they are not on Joe average’s desktop, but a lot of that is to do with the quality of the Java coders rather than the language (and there are plenty of crappy C++, VB, and C# projects out there too). What about NetBeans? or the recently released Dundjinni? What about scientific programs like Imagene or TFCompanion? or any of the trillions of Java image gallery programs. Haven’t used any Java apps, eh? sounds like you haven’t been looking. Need native compilation, sure go ahead, use gcj on Linux or Excelsior JET (Windows or Linux). What more do you need? Need it to look like SWING, sure go ahead and use SwingWT ( ). The SWT toolkit for eclipse is programmed in Java and is fully native with great performance.
0 kommentar(er)
